inspector who under scrutiny said appeared

INSPECTOR WHO UNDER SCRUTINY SAID APPEARED SERIES

Since the pandemic began in early 2020, more than 1.13 million people in the U.S. But all of the theft, big and small, illustrates an epidemic of scams and swindles at a time America was grappling with overrun hospitals, school closures and shuttered businesses. The pilfering was wide but not always as deep as the eye-catching headlines about cases involving many millions of dollars. Those programs were designed to help small businesses and unemployed workers survive the economic upheaval caused by the pandemic. Most of the looted money was swiped from three large pandemic-relief initiatives launched during the Trump administration and inherited by President Joe Biden. The department’s budget was $5.5 million in 2015, of which it spent only $4.A sheet of uncut $100 bills is inspected during the printing process at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing Western Currency Facility in Fort Worth, Texas, on Sept. Investigators met with 400 witnesses in 2015, and by the end of the year had 130 investigations still underway, and had closed 105 investigations. Of those, only half fell within the inspector general’s mandate. In 2015, there were 296 tips of questionable dealings called or emailed in to the inspector general, down slightly from the 308 submitted in 2014. The department was created in February 2014 in the wake of numerous reports of collusion that was driving up the costs of contracts by as much as 30 per cent. The report shows the scope of the bureau’s reach, and its necessity, Perez said, calling it an example for the rest of Canada. But with the inspector general with his powers, we have the watchdog we need.” “The city is not the only one, there is fraud in no matter what industry, no matter what domain, there is always that challenge.

“Human nature being what it is, you can’t be surprised,” he said. If Gallant did not release names, as he has in other cases, it must be for legal reasons, Perez said. Lionel Perez, executive committee member responsible for security, was not aware of the case outlined in the report.

INSPECTOR WHO UNDER SCRUTINY SAID APPEARED SERIES

There were a series of personal friends or close colleagues who benefited from no-bid contracts from the Coderre administration, and this lies in the same vein.” “And it’s a tendency that we see more and more under the Coderre administration. “It’s not okay to skew a contract to favour a friend,” he said. Norris also criticized the fact Mayor Denis Coderre had access to the report as much as 10 days before other elected officials, who only receive a copy during regularly scheduled city council meetings.

“We need a larger transparency of the administration, including the inspector general himself. The inspector general’s office advised the division chief’s superior, and the bidding process was stopped the same day.Īlex Norris, security critic for opposition party Projet Montréal, said it was unacceptable the inspector general’s report did not cite the name of the division chief, the firm, or outline what repercussions were mandated.

Tried to give the contract to his friend’s firm without going through the bidding process, on the argument it would get the work started sooner.Ī city lawyer had to obtain a legal warning to stop the awarding of the contract.

Chose the members of the selection committee, including one of his employees, and.

Contacted the head of the firm during the bidding process.Asked his employees to draw up the contract parameters so his friend would be sure to win.Witness testimony revealed the division head: In the overview of 2015, Gallant reveals an as yet unpublicized report about a division chief with the city who tried to skew the bidding process to favour his friend’s firm. “(They) have the primary responsibility to put in place measures ensuring the control and monitoring of contracting processes and the carrying out of contracts.” “The accountability of the city’s managers must be brought back to the forefront,” Gallant writes. At the same time, “because of the importance of these files and the costs they entail for the municipal administration, overseeing contracts awarded in the field of information technology will be one of my priorities for the year 2016,” Gallant wrote.Ībove all, the work of his department of roughly 30 inspectors who investigate the awarding and carrying out of public contracts has brought to light the need for upper management to keep a tight watch on their departments and the contracts flowing through them.

Inspector who under scrutiny said appeared